It’s a nasty rainy looking day on the first stage of the Tour. Causing a little bit of trouble with spills, but nothing that looked too bad. Look for a big finish by the sprinters today.
Today’s OLN word of the day is LANCE.
Perspectives of a Canadian in the Old/Deep/New/Geographic South: This is where I ramble on about nothing in particular and post a few nice pictures.
It’s day 1 of the Tour de France. Starting with a short individual team time trial (6.1 km) in Liege Belgium. Looks to be a simple out and back course. Fastest cyclist at the moment is Pereiro at 7:01.39, givng him an average speed of 52.1 kph. They’re really cruising. I can only manage speeds like that for short bursts.
Today’s OLN word of the day is CYCLYSM.
We’ve been teaching our first year (second year now) residents about nuclear medicine physics, and one of the topics we’ve covered is producing radionuclides for medical use. So I’m trying to whip up a spreadsheet that will model the activity of a typical Mo-Tc radionuclide generator to show off transient equilibrium and what happens when the generator is eluted.
Modelling the Mo/Tc activity in the generator is easy. What I’m finding a little more difficult is including the effects of generator elution where some of the Tc activity is removed from the generator. I’m thinking if I can reformulate the transient equilibrium equation as a recursive equation that looks something like A(t+dt) = f(A(t)) then I can get it to work. Spreadsheets are good at dealing with recursive equations. Should be simple.
So let’s start with the Bateman equation (need to learn some MathML). For a 2 radionuclide (parent/daughter) setup, it looks like
Ad(t) = Ap(0)(λd/(λd-λp))(exp(-λpt)-exp(-λdt)) + Ad(0)exp(-λdt)
Now, it’s a fairly simple exercise to show that when transient equilibrium is established, the recursive equation has the form
Ad(t+1) = Ad(t)exp(-λp)
But, when the generator is eluted, transient equilibrium no longer exists, and we need to go back to the Bateman equation to determine the daughter activity.
So, supposing that at time t=0, we have no initial daughter activity. Our equation looks like
Ad(0) = Ap(0)(λd/(λd-λp))
And at time t=1, we have
Ad(1) = Ap(0)(λd/(λd-λp))(exp(-λp)-exp(-λd))
At time t=2,
Ad(1) = Ap(0)(λd/(λd-λp))(exp(-2λp)-exp(-2λd))
Already we can see that the term containing the difference of exponentials
exp(-λp)-exp(-λd)
is going to cause a lot of grief. A recursive Bateman equation may not be possible. I may have to come up with another way to do my spreadsheet.
Just checking to see if MathML is usable inside this weblog with my browsers at all.
Rats, well that didn’t work too well, did it.
Not quite sure I understand what’s going on here. According to the sample pages it should mostly work with Firefox, Mozilla and IE6. Not sure why the examples above don’t work. I must be doing something wrong…
Either spammers are getting better at constructing their messages to evade filters, are just spamming more or Earthlink’s Spamblocker has been seriously sucking lately because the amount of spam making it through to my inbox has at least doubled over the past few days.
Normally I’d just see 7-10 messages a day in the junk mailbox when I check my mail in the morning and usually none throughout the day, but lately it’s been more like 20-30 messages in the morning and a relatively steady stream of 2-3/hour throughout the rest of the day.
That said, Spamblocker is still great. What gets through is probably about a tenth of what gets intercepted. And what does get through gets tagged by POPFile and sent to the trash by my Eudora filters so I never have to dirty my eyeballs looking at it.
So hah! Take that spammers!